February 2024

Conference Paper

AI ATAC 1: An Evaluation of Prominent Commercial Malware Detectors

By:
Bridges, Robert A; Weber, Brian ; Beaver, Justin; Smith, Jared; Spakes, Kevin D; Watson, Cory L; Nichols, Jeffrey A; Jewell, Brian C; Iannacone, Michael ; Huffer, Kelly M; Oesch, Timothy S; Verma, Miki; Norem, Savannah; Dunivan Stahl, Chelsey K
Page Number:
1620-1629
Issue Number:
n/a
Book Title:
2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)
Publication Date:
February 6, 2024
Publisher Location:
IEEE, New Jersey, United States of America
Conference Name:
IEEE International Conference on Big Data
Conference Location:
Sorrento, Italy
Conference Sponsor:
Various
View DOI Listing:
https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData59044.2023.10386590

Abstract

This work presents an evaluation of six prominent commercial endpoint malware detectors, a network malware detector, and a file-conviction algorithm from a cyber technology vendor. The evaluation was administered as the first of the Artificial I ntelligence Applications t o Autonomous Cybersecurity (AI ATAC) prize challenges, funded by / completed in service of the US Navy. The experiment employed 100K files (50/50% benign/malicious) with a stratified distribution of file types, including ~1K zero-day program executables (increasing experiment size two orders of magnitude over previous work). We present an evaluation process of delivering a file to a fresh virtual machine donning the detection technology, waiting 90s to allow static detection, then executing the file and waiting another period for dynamic detection; this allows greater fidelity in the observational data than previous experiments, in particular, resource and time-to-detection statistics. To execute all 800K trials (100K files × 8 tools), a software framework is designed to choreograph the experiment into an automated, time-synced, and reproducible workflow with substantial parallelization. Software with base classes for this framework are provided. A cost-benefit model was configured to integrate the tools’ detection statistics into a comparable quantity by simulating costs of use. This provides a ranking methodology for cyber competitions and a lens for reasoning about the varied statistical results. The results provide insights on state of commercial malware detection.